. . . when you’re down and out.
Peggy Noonan, especially, doesn’t care for that. At all.
Nobody loves Obama. This is amazing because every president has people who love him, who feel deep personal affection or connection, who have a stubborn, even beautiful refusal to let what they know are just criticisms affect their feelings of regard. At the height of Bill Clinton’s troubles there were always people who’d say, “Look, I love the guy.” They’d often be smiling—a wry smile, a shrugging smile. Nobody smiles when they talk about Mr. Obama. There were people who loved George W. Bush when he was at his most unpopular, and they meant it and would say it. But people aren’t that way about Mr. Obama. He has supporters and bundlers and contributors, he has voters, he may win. But his support is grim support. And surely this has implications.
The past few weeks I’ve asked Democrats who supported him how they feel about him. I got back nothing that showed personal investment. Here are the words of a hard-line progressive and wise veteran of the political wars: “I never loved Barack Obama. That said, among my crowd who did ‘love’ him, I can’t think of anyone who still does.” Why is Mr. Obama different from Messrs. Clinton and Bush? “Clinton radiated personality. As angry as folks got with him about Nafta or Monica, there was always a sense of genuine, generous caring.” With Bush, “if folks were upset with him, he still had this goofy kind of personality that folks could relate to. You might think he was totally misguided but he seemed genuinely so. . . . Maybe the most important word that described Clinton and Bush but not Obama is ‘genuine.’” He “doesn’t exude any feeling that what he says and does is genuine.” . . .
And so his failures in the debt ceiling fight. He wasn’t serious, he was only shrewd—and shrewdness wasn’t enough. He demagogued the issue—no Social Security checks—until he was called out, and then went on the hustings spouting inanities. He left conservatives scratching their heads: They could have made a better, more moving case for the liberal ideal as translated into the modern moment, than he did. He never offered a plan. In a crisis he was merely sly. And no one likes sly, no one respects it.
So he is losing a battle in which he had superior forces—the presidency, the U.S. Senate. In the process he revealed that his foes have given him too much mystique. He is not a devil, an alien, a socialist. He is a loser. And this is America, where nobody loves a loser.
- Excited
- Angry
- Not as Angry
- Bored
- Indifferent
- Sad








I disagree with Noonan that he is not a socialist, but I do agree that there is no love for 0bama, but the reason for this is more than his lack of genuineness, it is mainly due to his horrible personality in that he is childish and mean.
NOT TRUE!
I found SOMEONE who loves Obama!
http://tinyurl.com/3tzw649
Hahaha, the Republican social lepers saying the most popular man in the country is unloved.
I can smell the wingnut desperation.
If he’s the most popular man in the country, why are so many people lying to the Pollsters?
I’m smelling me some Ponce desperation here.
You sound a little defensive, brother.
I’ll try to gloat a little less.
I shouldn’t laugh seeing Boner and McConnell on the TV begging Obama to save them from their party’s freaks.
Obama “plan”: 0-97
I’d say Obama’s plan is going exactly how he planned.
The Tea Party freaks walk to the edge of the cliff, Obama gives them a swift kick in the ass and walks away with a 14th Amendment smile.
Or Boehner and McConnell kick the freaks off the cliff themselves in an attempt to save what’s left of the Republican party.
Either way, big, big win for Obama.
I’d respect your snarking a little more if you’d bother to keep current about what’s actually going on.
He’s got the narcotrafficantes and the cokeheads behind him. That means he carries NY and CA…
Deal.
Too bad for you, poncey.
Yeah, Peggy’s probably correct, and I derive a great amount of schadenfruede from the likes of her’s and Robert Reich’s assessments of Obama’s leadership deficit these days.
But I have to wonder where all this astute judgement of her’s was when she was essentially endorsing Obama in 2008; joining the David Brookses and Frums in praising his SUPERIOR TEMPERMENT!, JUDGEMENT!, BRILLIANCE!, his POST-PARTISAN-NESS! as well as admiring his pants crease and ability to burble on about Niebuhr
extemporaneouslypretentiously…Should the “wrong” person be the GOP nominee (i.e. for Peggy that means unless it’s Mittenz or Huntesman) she’ll be back to slobbering about Obama and deciding that Americans like to give failed Presidents a second chance.
I’m not sure that the Mittster or Huntsman would be any better, in the sense of keeping us from going over the next cliff, too.
Such being the case, if people of my position have anything to say about it, count on a renewed enthusiasm for The Won from that quarter shortly after the Republican Convention.