This does a more than adequate job of saying what needs to be said about the subject:
“Unseemly” describes it best. But when the rest of your record is so abysmal, unseemly is all you have.
The truth is that getting bin Laden was the top counterterrorism objective for U.S. intelligence since well before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. This administration built on work painstakingly pursued for many years before Obama was elected — and without this work, Obama administration officials never would have been in a position to authorize the strike on Abbottabad, Pakistan, that resulted in bin Laden’s overdue death.
Most reasonable people have already figured that out despite the “look I did it” claims of Obama. Critics can trash Mitt Romney all they want, but he was right – even Jimmy Carter would have made the call Obama made. And, had the operation gone wrong, despite what Bill Clinton says, the target would never have been known (until possibly, much, much later). America would have simply believed that one of hundreds of special operations that were conducted monthly, had gone south. It is war. It happens.
And, of course, what was the concern from Clinton? Politics, of course. Nothing more, nothing less.
“Gutsy”.
UPDATE: Then, of course, there’s this.
UPDATE II: Good lord, he even gave himself a “shout out” while in Afghanistan.
~McQ
Starless on May 2, 2012 at 3:27 pm said:
There’s the flip side, which is the consequences for choosing to do nothing when he had the means and the opportunity–something Bill Clinton likely knows well. You don’t get to spike the football if you do something when you know that if you fail to do it you will go down in history as a coward.
Good lord, he even gave himself a “shout out”
Isn’t that tantamount to masturbation?