No? So why the anti-American slogans on the pre-printed signs, the US flag burning?
Because of the "extremist Copts"?
Yesterday the DoJ, arriving at a new low, helpfully identified the maker of the movie that is the pretext for these acts of violent aggression. Obama's shills continued to claim that there was no evidence the Libya murders were pre-planned and organized. We're supposed to believe that some radical Islamists got it into their heads to have a tweet up, and, oh, BYORPGs.
Religulous producer Bill Maher complained that Romney was "exploiting" the embassy murders, the day after Obama compared his volunteers with diplomats in danger.
Rioters in Lebanon, furious at the Pope's visit, burned a KFC and a Hardee's, killing one. Probably because of a movie filmed at the Vatican.
The murderous militants apparently used civilians protesting an anti-Islam film as their cover to launch the two-part attack on the consulate in Benghazi, said Sharef.
Obviously, there are people protesting just the movie, and just as obviously some of the people who riled them up would have done so exactly in order to provide cover for the main attraction. It's a system that's used here in the US by Occupy, as described by Brandon Darby. Occupy is backed by the Chicago Teachers Union.
But no, not planned. Just happened to be 9-11.
Both the Islamist terrorists and the White House want people to think it's about a movie.
UPDATE: Nolte on the latest Obamedia memebending.
Latest iteration of dumb: The movie protests were spontaneous, but the al Qaeda people saw it and thought they could make use of them, because if there were a plot we would be expected to have known something about it and then the administration would be accountable.
