This man may be in charge of our nation's defense.
Soooo…it may be Senator Lurch, then…
What will be his first act as Secretary of Defense? Have all US soldiers, sailors, and Marines prosecuted for war crimes by an international tribunal? Pull them all back from "occupied" nations like…South Korea? As a matter of conscience, tow the Missouri back to Tokyo Bay so we can retroactively surrender to the Japanese for dropping The Bomb on them?
Someone please tell me if there's ever been a Secretary of Defense of the United States of America who has ever been as openly contemptuous of the US military as John Effin Kerry.
And I guess "After my election, I'll have more flexiblity" translates to "SecState Susan Rice". I've only got a couple of questions about this one: will she be sending the technical specs for the SM-3 and SPY-1 to the Soviets Russians via e-mail or diplomatic courier? And will Progressives refer to her as respectfully as they referred to the previous SecState Rice?
I realize we have to try to be patient and allow voters to figure out their mistake on their own, but, at least on the foreign policy front, it seems like we're going to pay an inordinately high price in the process.
BTW, every time I see a reference to Susan Rice (as in, "Rice said") I think of Donna Rice. It has nothing to with Ssan Rice and everything to do with how freakin' old I am.
King Shamus on November 13, 2012 at 5:48 pm said:
You said Doodee.
Also, I wonder if Jean-Fwwwancoise Kerry will rule the Pentagon in a manner reminiscent of Jenjis Khan.
Starless on November 13, 2012 at 10:24 pm said:
"Doodee"…uh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh…
I imagine there will be much jenjis conning going on.
Mike G. on November 13, 2012 at 6:37 pm said:
And did you notice the only person in the picture who is handling her weapon in a safe manner is the woman in the background?
Yep, if Kerry gets the nod, we are well and truely screwed.
Starless on November 13, 2012 at 10:28 pm said:
The resemblance to this is uncanny.
jefferson101 on November 13, 2012 at 7:25 pm said:
Screwed? Yes we are. Well and Truly, for sure.
Elections have consequences, and one of them may well be that the RINOs who insist that we get the guy who's "turn it is" to run as a nominee are as messed over as anyone else is.
Just for the record, if TS does HTF, I have about as much anomosity toward the Beltway RINO group as I do toward Nancy Pelosi. They are all about as corrupt as any of them are, and I would not trust any of them as far as I could throw them. So, should it come to that, John Bohener better not be the one they send to negotiate with anyone who thinks like I do about them.
That will get ugly, really quickly.
Just saying……