Angry Mean Baby is as outraged as I am.
This post has been nagging me like a feminist girlfriend for the past week and a half, especially this part:
Ann Coulter and Andrew Breitbart (and Levin and Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin) wrote a lot, and said a lot, but their basic theme is pretty consistent throughout their writing:
fuck
you
Which is a pretty damn important message, actually. Vulgarity aside, I think that just might be the most important political message.
As the news has unfolded and the MSM/Leftists have "reported" and spewed their opinions, my internal running commentary has been dominated by that single, simple phrase: fuck you.
There was the revelation that if the President says asploding American citizens via MQ-9, without due process, is legal, then it's legal. Compared to the sustained fury over "torturing" foreign enemy combatants during the Bush administration, the Left's response to Obama's remote-controlled snuff program has been rather muted. They're careful to express their reservations over killing Americans overseas, yet they seem quite willing to deflect responsibility away from Obama himself (yeah, Friedersdorf, you fucking Leftist assclown, it's terrible but we were just asking for it weren't we?) Also in contrast to their response to "torture", these Leftists seem less concerned about the morality of the President using the might of the American military to resolve Americans into their constituent parts (remember when waterboarding was destroying our nation's soul?) than they are about the legality of it all.
To their lame attempts to give excuses and deflect responsibility away from their Boyfriend-in-Chief for the drone war, I offer a hale and hearty, "GO FUCK YOURSELVES".
And then there was the Floyd Corkins plea. GUILTY-GUILTY-GUILTY! Guilty of a federal firearms charge, guilty of intent to kill while armed and guilty of an act of terrorism with intent to kill. But, wait, where's the cherry-on-top hate crime charge? Why isn't he going to get that little extra something for targeting people for what they believe and the types of people they are? I thought that was the sort of thing prosecutors and the media live for these days. I guess that element of his crime gets buried along with the lede about the SPLC aspect of this story.
The SPLC — long, long ago — used to actually do good things like fight the Klan but now they're just another group of kneejerk grievance-mongers using the legal system to demonize people whose opinions don't conform to Leftist dogma. So SPLC: take your hypocritical, judgmental self-righteousness, fold it until it's all corners, and cram it up your butthole. FUCK YOU.
The piece of resistance story has been, naturally, that of Christopher Dorner — also known as "Black Rambo" or, as I've now started to think of him, "Marc Lamont Hill's Ultimate Mancrush". It was bad enough that the media started off reporting this story by first running Dorner's manifesto through MiniTrue, but then the Dornerers oozed their way out of the woodwork, and now they're trying to turn the issue on its head and make Dorner into some sort of hero-victim. Somebody remind me here: how many academics demanded that we try to understand Timothy McVeigh and his "perspective" after he destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah building in an act of domestic terrorism? Did anyone insist that we must sympathize with the plight of young, disaffected, anti-government whites or did the federal government crack down even harder on groups which attracted young, disaffected, anti-government whites?
Yeah, it was the latter (and is a policy which persists and has been widened, BTW). So this time the terrorist is a Leftist black guy which makes it a totally different thing because he's been "oppressed" and the atrocities he committed says something about white society? Whereas, if he had been white (like, say, Adam Lanza), once again his atrocities would have only said something about white society. Fuck, fuck, fuck, FUCKITY-FUCK YOU! Terror is terror and it knows no race.
At the end of the Bush 47 administration, it had become quite clear that "compassionate conservatism" was a vote-pandering load of shit. Not that GWB was insincere — I believe that, mainly due to his religion, GWB really believed that his policies were compassionate and the morally correct thing to do for all. But hundreds of billions of dollars for banks was just too much and the TEA Party was born. I was very encouraged because the TEA Party looked and sounded nothing like the Moral Majority protest groups of the '80s. The TEA Party's aim was spelled out clearly in its name: Taxed Enough Already. It was clearly, to me, a movement which was not about race or religion, yet immediately the assholes in the MSM made it about race and religion. They assumed that because it didn't grow out of the Left, it must necessarily be white and Christian and therefore anti-not-white and anti-not-Christian.
So here we are. It's 2013 and not a single act of violence or racism can be attributed to the TEA Party. Any bigoted or violent speech or act attributed to the TEA Party by the MSM has been proven to be committed by either Leftist agents provocateurs or nuts who have nothing to do with the TEA Party like the Larouchies. And yet these fuckers continue to assume that any act of violence which smells even slightly of politics or race must be a product of the TEA Party.
The worst and most egregious example, of course, is that of Jared Loughner. Loughner, who has no discernable political affiliation, has been used to beat at every single door of the conservative movement. The latest being the Left's gun-grabbing ploy.
We're not just talking about standard-issue mudslinging, nor are we talking about a shade of bias in the media which is causing them to unknowingly be unfair, we're talking about an overt campaign to destroy our liberty with out-and-out lies.
So, FUCK YOU Left. Fuck you and the gluten-free, green energy, indentity group, public policy, critical race, gender studies horse you rode in on. You really think political speech must be "toned down"? You really believe that "compromise", "moderation", and "civlity" are so goddamned important? Try practicing what you preach for once in your miserable lives, you assholes.
Until you fuckers do that, I'm done. You get no more consideration, no more presumptions of good will, no more "negotiating in good faith". So, in short, FUCK OFF.
[UPDATE]
Would these jag-off asshole useful idiots say the same thing about the FBI and Ruby Ridge?
