The Necropolitan Sentinel

chi per lungo silenzio parea fioco

Home » Articles posted by Joy McCann

The Fight Against the Speech-Suppressors

Always take pictures of people who are trying to photograph your house.

I'm with Glenn: that may not have been a Kimberlin Krony, but unless it's someone who's hunting for real estate and just wants to show her spouse a particular architectural detail or paint color—or a social historian out to demonstrate how neighborhoods have changed over the past few decades—it's someone who should themselves be photographed, along with the license plate on his/her car. We should all have cameras in our pockets as much of the time as we can manage it in these strange, strange times.

Because, as they say, sh*t just got real. Brett Kimberlin has declared war on the Bill of Rights, and the legacy media (not to mention The Daily Caller, and The Drudge Report) largely look the other way.

Professor Eugene Volokh will be helping Aaron Walker out in an advisory capacity, countering Kimberlin's "warfare" pro bono. Professor Volokh is one of the blogosphere's true gentlemen, but he has a mind like a scalpel. And he's forgotten more about the Bill of Rights than most constitutional scholars ever knew. The fight just got fairer, but far less . . . equal.

Please keep the professor's family in your thoughts, and the families of all who have stuck their necks out; we know how the anti-speech forces play this game. "Outing" Ali Akbar's mother is just . . . it's how these bottom-feeders work. Pity the anti-speechers, but keep your guard up, too.

In the meantime, consider what you want to say to your state and Federal legislators on Free Speech Friday, 6/8, when many bloggers who are either right-leaning and/or passionate about the First Amendment will be focusing on the cause of robust speech, and calling for action within the states and on a national scale to combat abusive, SLAPP-oriented "warfare."

Ace is calling it a Day of Silence, but if you read his post it's clear that it's really "Free Speech Friday" or "Focus Friday." Whatever you call it, it will be time, as he points out, for us to get some "representation" from our representatives. In both senses of the word. Too many are standing by while ordinary citizens' rights are trampled upon.

Ace:

On Friday, this site will be absolutely dead-silent, which is what Brett Kimberlin and his stalker crew seeks, and what the media and our supposed Representatives in Congress would permit.

The only post on Friday will be a bold-faced Open Letter to Congress, urging them to act and not attempt to pass the buck to others.

They are our representatives; we would like some representation.

They vowed to defend and protect the Constitution; they can honor that vow now.

I will post links of Congressmen’s and Senator’s email addresses and offices and phone numbers, and urge every concerned American citizen to let them know, in no uncertain terms, that a crime in progress against the First Amendment (and people’s safety) is occurring, and we humbly request they take this seriously.

They are literally going to get someone killed. That is their endgame here.

Will the media and Congress pretend “we didn’t know” when this happens?

ABCNews knows.

The Weekly Standard knows.

The Daily Caller knows.

And many, but not yet all, Congressmen and Senators know.

I encourage all bloggers and twitterers to essentially strike that day, or write nothing except your desire that you expect your Congressmen to take threats to your First Amendment rights seriously.

Oh: Do not be provoked into saying something jackass. . . Everytime you say something intemperate, Brett Kimberlin smiles.

Yes.

Also: if you want to investigate any unsafe sites run by stalkerish types, you must never go there the way you would a site you respect and trust. The most unhinged blogs require safe surfing. Never, ever go to stalker-sites without masking your IP. (If you want to know the URL of the site that is run by the Kimberlin Kronies, ask someone—but go to Anonymouse first. Please.)

Furthermore, Michelle's roundup is a must-read, as is the latest update from Popehat (bottom line: we need more attorney-volunteers in FL and TN, but read the whole thing). If you want some bonus-snark from Popehat regarding the Serial Speech Suppressors, Ken has you covered. Enjoy.

Folks, if we don't have freedom of speech in this country, it's all over. That's why I keep repeating over and over that Kimberlin's speech-suppression isn't a partisan issue, and reminding everyone that some of Kimberlin's victims have been liberals and Democrats.

As Ace keeps pointing out, this is no "blog war." Aaron Walker and his wife have lost their jobs for expressing themselves online. Aaron has been framed for a crime, and had multiple restraining orders filed against him, which were approved. He has been arrested for blogging.

Mend fences with everyone you've ever squabbled with. (Okay, not Crazy Charles of LGF—or the other dangerous stalkers who are just as unhinged as Kimberlin, but less ambitious. Just everyone else.) Declare a truce until we've defeated the anti-speech brigade. And reach across the ideological fence, because too few liberal bloggers know about this, and it's critically important for them as well as for us.

Try to kick in a few dollars for the relief fund/legal defense kitty.

And get ready for Friday.

(Cross-posted at Little Miss Attila.)

Fundraising Time!

Hi, guys. It's time to play "keep the lights on at The Conservatory." Anything we receive this week in excess of our expenses for June and July will go either to Dan's travel fund, or to the Bloggers' Club fund for assisting victims of the Kimberlin Kronies. Thanks so much for helping out!

Progress, at Last, on the Keystone XL Pipeline?

Our friends at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently interviewed Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman for a story on their upcoming “Jobs Summit,” to take place on the 14th of June . . . and heard some very interesting news.

As most of you are aware, Nebraska has been the epicenter of dispute about the privately funded Keystone XL Pipeline, a project that has been in the works for years, but has been in doubt since President Obama rejected it, based on enviromental concerns . . . having to do with the pipeline’s route through Nebraska. At the time, energy-friendly voices wondered why the President didn’t simply grant conditional approval to the project, until a better route through Nebraska could be finalized.

Free Enterprise, the Chamber of Commerce’s news site, picks things up from there:

[T]he conversation veered towards progress on the Keystone XL pipeline. The 1,700-mile oil pipeline, built by TransCanada, would run from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, and could create as many as 250,000 jobs by 2035. However, in January the administration rejected a permit to allow the project to move forward.

Since then, TransCanada and the state of Nebraska have been scrambling to come up with an alternate route.

Heineman was optimistic when we spoke to him, in part because he had just received a Memorandum of Understanding between the State Department and the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality on May 24.

Nebraska is currently conducting an environmental impact review of the new proposed route, which should take about five months. Therefore, Heineman says the MOU “just basically says when we get done with our environmental impact statement, they will accept that at the federal level so they don’t have to recreate it or redo it when we get to the federal level. That’s a key thing. If they decided they wouldn’t accept what we were doing in Nebraska and wanted to do it on their own—they’re not saying that, so I think that’s a very encouraging sign.”

So what does the MOU say? Heineman’s office was kind enough to send us a copy, and while it doesn’t go quite as far as saying the State Department will bypass its own environmental review process, it does offer to “work together in preparing and completing in a timely manner, a collaborative environmental analysis of routes within Nebraska.”

And, in another encouraging sign, the MOU says the parties commit to “seek agreement on key steps in the environmental review in order to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort and to expedite the process to the extent practicable.”

Plus, the president has signaled that he wants to remove barriers and cut through red tape. In March, he ordered his administration to “expedite” the southern portion of the Keystone XL pipeline. Could expediting the Nebraska portion be the next step?

The question remains as to whether TransCanada has lost its patience with U.S. obstructionism on this project: certainly its politicians continue to signal that they consider us less reliable, and may want to keep their options open in the future. Some have interpreted that to mean that they may see Alberta’s oil to the Chinese.

But the news from Nebraska may mean that the pipeline goes south, rather than west for shipment to China, after all. And that would be a very good thing.

The Avengers, Why We Need Heroic Storylines, and What Entertainment People Can Do About It


Roger L. Simon and Lionel Chetwynd note all the subversively pro-American messaging in The Avengers (in the middle third of this installment of Poliwood):

(Via Instapundit.)

The spouse and I made it a point to see The Avengers within a week of its release, because I wanted to experience the story before people got sloppy and started letting spoilers drop all over the internet.

I have become a bit of a Joss Whedon fan lately, having discovered that the Firefly series—and Serenity—live up to their billing. Whedon and I are a good match; I am a dialogue-snob, and that is one of his several strengths. Obviously, I have a lot of pleasure ahead of me, catching up with Buffy and Dr. Horrible; how you all must envy me!

I was pretty curious about what a hybrid Whedon-blockbuster production would look like. If one looks carefully, one definitely sees where he is subordinating himself to the Marvel franchise, but that doesn’t take away the joy of seeing his work writ large, with the biggest of budgets.

What Whedon’s politics actually are remains obscure to me, and that’s a good thing. (I have been told that he is an atheist, but that makes no never-mind, either.) Recall the fundamental message that Chetwynd and Simon touch on in the Poliwood sequence, for would-be promoters of free market values in the entertainment industry: Don’t make “conservative” films: make good narrative films with a broad appeal that don’t tear down faith, family, or our national ideals. We don’t want to emulate the most didactic, annoying lefty filmmakers; we want to sweet-talk our way into enough development money to kick their asses at the box office. And when we do, we’ll be far subtler about it than George Clooney is. At least, that’s my hope.

It’s worth noting that both hardcore libertarians and the unfortunates who lived in many of the OWS encampments, protesting . . . something unexplained . . . tend to be Firefly fans. A lot of lefty would-be individualists don’t quite realize how much power they want to give to the state, and so cannot (or do not bother to) reconcile their individuality to their desire for domination by the government. But if there’s one thing Firefly was against, it was government domination.

We on the right are consistent about this, and we are willing to deal with the contradictions that must occur between that and our desire to live with some law and order, with some moral norms. The city park-usurpers don’t.

I really did love The Avengers. This was a beautiful, pro-American, elegant action film. And it used classic comic book tropes without being formulaic—but then, that’s why they hired Whedon. He has his idiosyncracies, but he wasn’t going to give us a warmed-over comic book, and then go home for dinner. He would—he did—make what was classic into something still that. But also fresh and novel.

The movie’s message was a clear one: sometimes, we all have to stand up. Everyone loves to roll their eyes at flag-waving, after all—until the Twin Towers are destroyed, and suddenly it’s cool to wear a flag pin on their lapels again. For a few years. A threat to your country—or your planet—is a time to set differences aside and . . . well, maybe even get along with people you don’t ordinarily like to work with. Including people like Tony Stark who can be real pricks.

Sequences set in the streets of New York City were hard to watch, at times, because the real New York had been the site of a genuine terrorist attack in 2001. But I’m glad that the movie stuck with the iconic city that stands for American commerce. (That’s the rule: if it’s a detective story, the default is Los Angeles. If it’s superheroes, you’ll want to start in New York. Mobsters, Chicago or Las Vegas. Know why you picked the classic location. Know why you went with something different.)

The only real “beach head” conservatives have in the entertainment industry is in action films and TV shows. It appears to be more respectable to be a star (or, in Clint Eastwood’s case, a director and producer) if one is involved in films with the classic heroic storylines that appear in action movies (and war stories, and Westerns).

It’s as if there is a school of thought within the Hollywood establishment that, “well, what can one expect? So-and-so made his money promoting this black-and-white notion that there really is some honest good in the world—and some outright evil—and he (it’s usually a he) has taken it very much to heart.” They make allowances for that “old-fashioned” idea having seeped into the poor unfortunate’s consciousness. Also, Robert Downey, Jr. has undeniable onscreen charisma. As do Arnold Schwarzenegger, Chuck Norris, and Tom Selleck. As did John Wayne. And on and on.

When these types of films succeed, they succeed very well. It would be lovely to see those who made their fortunes in these genres help to fund semi-conservative production companies (ones that employ people across the ideological spectrum, of course, for maximum intellectual cross-pollination). Such enterprises might create other types of narrative films that would reinforce the virtues we see denigrated in popular culture—such as the desirability of family ties, the value of the individual, the human yearning for freedom, the role that faith can sometimes play in personal development, and the need we all have to be more than part of a great machine, or servants to an almighty state.

Again: I don’t care what Whedon’s intellectual underpinnings are. He can be right or left. The important thing is that he is a good writer who is excellent at touching on the themes of loyalty, faith, equality that isn’t sameness, and the need to decide, from time to time, which authorities should be obeyed—and which should be resisted.

That’s the model, Hollywood. Are you ready? Now get going.

“Politics are downstream from culture.”
—Andrew Breitbart

(X-posted at Little Miss Attila)

Joy’s Leave of Absence [Plus Site Notes from Dan]

[Post bumped by Dan for the weekend]

Well, I’m making it official now.

With the eBook taking up more and more of my time, I’m formally withdrawing from my duties here as copyeditor, reporter, and art director. While I’ll continue on as publisher/administrator—and may still write essays on occasion—I’ll be leaving the day-to-day running of the site to Dan, Enoch, Bruce, Mac, and Meep (Meep will be continuing with her column, and will be providing the guys with binding notes on matters of consistency in artwork and style). Dan will still be brainstorming with me from time to time, and any notes I supply to the writers will still be binding, but I’m essentially out of here until I’ve finished the manuscript for Book 1.

For all practical purposes, I’ve demoted myself to occasional writer until at least the end of July. If there’s a matter you need addressed you’ll want to speak with Dan. I’ll be available to adjudicate disputes between the other editors, or address any management issues in the unlikely event that you don’t feel that Dan is “hearing you out” properly, but please save me for emergencies (joy.mccann at that gmail-like place).

I may also do some real blogging, which I haven’t been able to do over the course of the past year, so you might add Little Miss Attila to your bookmarks again. Small amounts of blogging are actually excellent cross-training when one is working on a book.

Also, I just want to note that we still need to pay the bills this summer, so the tip jar is below. If you’d like the site to continue in my absence, you know what to do. (And many thanks to Jefferson for covering our hosting fees for May. Just in the nick of time!)





Goodbye, for now.

[Site Notes: Please do hit the tip jar. None of us asks very often, and we're aware that there are a lot of good causes (Valley of the Shadow, Jeff Goldstein, Da Techguy off da radio) that ask for your support, but we'd like at least to be able to pay the bills from month to month. If you have an interest in donating by way of writing for us, please apply to Joy, who will probably have enough time to respond to the rest of us, even though she's busy. Finally, I'm unilaterally declaring next Saturday Inter-Blog Outreach Day here at The Conservatory, so I urge the writers to post with links to exceptional posts at other blogs. If we're missing any, this will give you readers a chance to provide us with thumb-nail overviews of sites that we and our other readers may be missing, in comments. So, you've got a week to think about that, if you will be so kind.

And, as always, thanks to the readers and especially the commenters who make it worth our while to keep posting here.]

The Los Angeles Riots: Human Nature on Parade


Twenty years ago, the “Rodney King” riots in Los Angeles started. I was heading home from work as they began, and spent that first night in my apartment on Exposition Boulevard in a poor/working class section of West Los Angeles, watching TV news—which to this day, I can only get myself to do on special situations, like when news is breaking fast, or my mother needs company.

She called me that night, you know. She asked me what I was up to, and I replied, “watching the city burn.”

“They’re not . . . they’re not . . . rioting, are they?” she asked. But it was rhetorical.

That was a Wednesday. On Thursday, I went to work for a few hours, but it took me a while because I didn’t want to drive on the major freeways that go through the center of the city. After all, as my boyfriend of the time (now my husband) pointed out, avoiding surface streets wasn’t enough: “you can still catch a bullet.” I took a long loop through the edge cities and suburbs to get to Alhambra that day.

A lot of people went to work on Thursday, and most of us were sent home by early afternoon: there was no law in most of the Los Angeles metro area, and few companies wanted to be responsible for keeping employees on their premises after dark. There would be no law in the Los Angeles basin for two days.

A friend of mine went home that day to her liberal-left parents in the San Fernando Valley. She was an adult, and had pooled resources with her folks to buy a house some years before. Part of the bargain was that she was to keep her .357 in the garage— her parents’ aversion to weapons wasn’t just reflective leftism; they had been in Europe during World War II. They had seen enough violence, and reminders thereof, to last them a lifetime.

As she left the studio where she worked, she began thinking about how she was going to convince her father that she needed to bring her revolver into the house. By the time she had bought gasoline, gone to the bank, and hit the gorcery store—enduring longer and longer lines at every stop, because we were all doing the same things—she had a list ready with scores of reasons that it was important for her to retreive that gun.

When she walked into her San Fernando Valley home, her dad was loading up his rifle in the living room. The discussion, of course, wouldn’t have to take place: his weapon was already out of storage.

Meanwhile, I had crossed town to join my boyfriend in Glendale at his apartment a few blocks away from a National Guard Armory. As he finished up at work, I shopped at a local Vons, standing in line with 30 other people of various races, including Latinos and blacks. We were all in this together. It was a 45-minute wait to buy groceries, so we had time to chat.

The whole issue had mostly transcended race on the first day of the riots: it was, by Day Two (as Dennis Prager would later characterize modern life in general), a matter of “the decent and the indecent.”

Except for Asian-American retailers, primarily Koreans, who were singled out for violence by a lot of the African-American rioters: the Asians were true victims, set up by media that had spent years carefully painting them as anti-black.

It’s important to recall here that plenty of rioters were not black—there were many Latinos and whites involved (in proportions, not just absolute numbers). And a lot of the criminals weren’t even from South-Central, or the area around Normandy, or any of the other pockets of poverty throughout L.A. that proved to be flashpoints: rioters drove to the hotspots to commit acts of violence and “get free stuff.”

What happened doesn’t reflect on any race so much as it does what happens when it becomes known that there is no police presence in one particular part of a highly mobile society that contains a certain number of sociopaths.

Also, get a gun, even if you decide to keep it in your garage.

Kevin Ferguson of KPCC would like me to point out, when I discuss the Los Angeles riots in the context of the Second Amendment, that there may have been a couple of “friendly fire” incidents among the 63 deaths and thousands of injuries that occurred as a result of those terrible 4-7 days. He’d also like to remind people that gun stores can be looted when things break down badly enough. Which . . . yes. Most gun stores have superior security, but when things get bad enough that can generally be overcome.

There were not then, and are not now, any limitations on the sale of concrete bricks like the one Damian Williams threw at Reginald Denny, who suffered permanent brain damage as a result of the beating he sustained on that first day of rioting. Denny was rescued by four heroic black people who risked their lives to get him to the hospital: Titus Murphy, Terri Barnett, Bobby Green, and Lei Yuille.

Heroics in wartime can never do more than puncuate the horror, though. Praise our heroes, but remember that war, and its faint echoes in “civil unrest,” let loose the ugliest side of human nature. There is a reason we want to contain all that. The Murphys, Barnetts, Greens, and Yuilles are fewer than we would like: they are too often outnumbered.

Today is the anniversary of the riot’s worst day—the day things broke down completely, and stayed broken for 48 hours.

More links [hover over the text to see them; we're still having technical problems]:

• A Korean-American photojournalist remembers watching his community suffer, while trying to document it as dispassionately as he could.

• KPCC puts together single-race panels to talk about the riots’ legacies. Yet one has the impression that the panels weren’t in the same room, but rather conducted at different times. I’m hoping that I mis-read that point, but I don’t think I did, and that’s very sad, twenty years out from these events. Some Korean-American families never recovered from their losses; the city of Los Angeles blocked many from rebuilding afterward, too. It’s an awful, shameful tale, really.

“We flew back home that afternoon, Los Angeles burning below us as the sun set over the Pacific.” Chuck DeVore on deploying with the National Guard, and the “thin veneer of civilization,” as they style it at Breitbart.com.

UPDATE: My husband links, and shares his memories. Without having to break 1000 works.

Fund-Drive Time at The Conservatory


I’ll keep this brief, and just remind everyone that the election is only several months away, so it’s really important that all conservative news sources keep going full-steam-ahead through the election.

So please help pay the bills; I’m trying to put enough together to get us through the summer and keep the lights on here.