The Necropolitan Sentinel

chi per lungo silenzio parea fioco

Home » Articles posted by Starless

FOR LEASE: One Historic Heavy Lift Launch Complex, For Inquiries Call 555-WESUCK

Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center first launched a Saturn V rocket in 1967 and continued launching internationally prestigious heavy lift vehicles until 2011 (with some pauses during that period). Now, like mall retail space, it has been put up for lease:

In a notice posted on its procurement website, the U.S. space agency said it was looking for one or more companies to take over operations and maintenance of Launch Complex 39A.

[...]

"We're on track for significant commercial operations here at the Cape," Kennedy Space Center Director Robert Cabana said last week at a National Space Club Florida meeting in Cape Canaveral.

NASA's Florida spaceport has demolished or transferred to commercial users more than 150 shuttle facilities, reducing its footprint by 1 million square feet (93,000 square meters), Cabana said.

Yes, there are a lot of reasonable arguments in favor of this and yes, privatization is the correct general direction to head in, but none of the arguments satisfactorily fill the prestige gap the precipitous cancellation of both the Shuttle and Constellation programs left. "Commercial" boosters will tell you that that gap is irrelevant, but I can assure you that it isn't irrelevant to the rest of the world, particularly to the Soviets Russians and the Chinese.

Has Everyone Forgotten Nick Berg?

I read something this morning which I found to be completely astonishing. In London, the seat of the Commonwealth of Nations, and formerly that of the once-mighty British Empire–an Empire whose sway over the world has been greater than that of the Romans, soldiers are told by their goverment to take great care where they wear their service uniforms for fear that they may "provoke" an attack from their fellow citizens. This is a concept which has me, as the Brits would say, gobsmacked.

Because I've got the attention span of a rhesus monkey, I have to find one thing which encapsulates an issue. With the Byzantine flurry of scandals surrounding the Obama administration–of which Dan has skillfully taken on the Herculean task of covering–this technique is particularly helpful. The AP/FNC scandal can be traced back to the first year of Obama's presidency when his administration all but declared Fox News Channel an enemy of the State. His treatment of FNC should have been a clear warning to all journalists that his administration respects their First Amendment rights only as long as they aren't inconvenient to it, but, as was exemplified by this NYT piece, they instead treated the White House War on Fox as a mere he said/she said disagreement (with their sympathies clearly for what "he said").

Likewise, the shenanigans pulled by the IRS should be no surprise after the administration has, for years, repeatedly fallen just short of declaring any groups which peacefully oppose it to be illegally subversive, if not terroristic, elements. The most recent red flag for the press and all other credulous parties should have been the claim that "low-level" IRS employees acted on their own. This is like saying that the A/R lady in the office next door believes that she can grant herself, completely independent of any direction from her bosses, the power to pick which customers receive invoices and which do not. It should contradict anyone's real-world experience that the IRS targeted conservative advocacy groups without some sort of approval from higher up. Yet the administration continues to try to sell the story that someone lower down in the food chain, without direction, went all rogue-like and illegally targeted a certain group for their speech.

More so than the AP/FNC and IRS scandals, Benghazi is far easier to explain. The explanation only takes one word, and that word is "mortar". As soon as the report that the annex had been hit by mortar fire (which, IIRC, came out on 9/12), any doubts that it was a coordinated and pre-planned terrorist attack should have disappeared. Firing a mortar takes a crew–a fact which, if you didn't know it already, doesn't take a milnerd super-sleuth to discover–and isn't in any way "spontaneous". If knowing that isn't enough, Gregory Hicks' testimony that the accuracy of the mortar fire was "terribly precise" combined with the fact that the mortar attack was at dawn (IOW, low light conditions) should tell anyone with rudimentary analytical abilities that the mortar targets had been pre-plotted at some earlier date. These very simple facts make the White House stories about "fog of war", bad YouTube videos, and shell games about when the president said "terrorism" obvious and bald-faced lies. To pretend that you believe them is to admit to either being a gullible simpleton or a partisan who stubbornly refuses to acknowledge inconvenient facts.

Today I'm seeing all kinds of hemming and hawing about what could have motivated those maniacs in the Woolwich execution, admonitions about jumping to conclusions, warnings about singling out certain types of people, and lots of talk about "lone wolves". What's the critical mass which makes a group of lone wolves a pack? What is the basis, beyond long past history, which justifies hyperventilating over singling certain types of people out? Even in the immediate aftermath of the attacks of 9/11/01, at a time when such things would have been most understandable, attacks and discrimination against Muslims for merely being Muslims were exceedingly rare, and the much-feared "rounding up" of Muslims never happened. Anywhere.

As far as jumping to conclusions is concerned, how deaf, dumb, and blind do politicians, pundits, and partisans think we are? In Woolwich, we were confronted with a man who not only brutally executed a serviceman, but stood around and waited for an ITV camera to show up so he could explain to us that he committed the act because of his belief that we have been attacking his people. That we are persecuting his people because of their religion. To top it all off, he and his partner attempted to cut their victim's head off. A signature move for violent Islamic extremists. Have we forgotten about Nick Berg, Lemuel Montulo and Leonel Mantic, and, a mere two months ago, Phillipe Verdon? Have Islamic extremists not been telegraphing their intentions for the past half century? How much more explicitly would the Woolwich murderer have to be for Leftist multiculti apologists to take him at his word?

Sorry, David Cameron and Boris Johnson, I'm going to have to go with my lying eyes on this one.

Coda

In tribute to Ingrid Loyau-Kennett, who showed more balls than the leaders of her nation, and in defiance of the brutal bullying of Islamists who want to cow the West with brazen murder in our streets, the UK Cub Scout Oath:

I promise that I will do my best, to do my duty to God and to the Queen, to help other people, and to keep the Cub Scout Law.

Post-Tornado Recriminations [UPDATE]

In the Spring of 1975, a tornado tore part of the roof off of my elementary school as I, along with several classmates, our teacher, and a man and his daughter, sheltered in the boys' bathroom. It was an especially hot day that day–I had worn my new sandals and a pair of shorts to school–and my classmates and I had stayed after school for a special activity. Before the activity, we were playing outside and I recall having a Dr. Seuss book with me. It was bright and sunny and then almost instantly the sky went green and unusually large rain drops started falling, leaving large wet spots on the book. I remember thinking that allowing a school book to be damaged was definitely not okay.

I don't think the tornado siren sounded, but we knew what that green sky and large rain drops meant so we ran inside, our teacher rushed us into the boys' bathroom and had us hunker down around one of those large old gang hand-washing sinks. I don't remember feeling afraid, but I do remember the man and his daughter coming into the bathroom–their pick-up had crashed into the school and the girl's thighs were cut up–and, more significantly, I remember being scandalized by the fact that there were girls in the boys' bathroom. (This, of course, was decades before extremist moral relativism had been normalized.) I remember hearing extremely loud wind banging, smashing, and crushing, but I don't remember hearing the stereotypical "freight train" sound.

After what seemed like a very long time, the wind died down and we emerged from the bathroom. In my sandals, I walked over broken glass through the halls out the front door of the school. Many people were out in the parking lot including what we used to call "firemen", but now are required to call "first responders", and my mom, who quickly grabbed me and brought me home where my dad was hosing leaves off of the back of the house. Family legend has it that the tornado hopped over our house, though in hindsight it seems unlikely.

Every time I see this picture on the news, I remember that day and I try to recall how I felt. Everything was so bizarre, happened so fast, and was, quite frankly, so exciting that I have to wonder if I was afraid at all. I wonder if the kid in that image was afraid. He looks traumatized and tired, of course, but he survived and he's going to have one Hell of a story to tell his friends.

Thankfully, the tornado I was in killed no one. It was a baby tornado whose speed was a mere 100 miles per hour. Things in Moore, OK, though, look exceedingly grim as time passes and we can hope that the children who took refuge in that hallway in Plaza Tower Elementary survived somehow. We don't even know those kids' fates yet, but the recriminations are already coming out. "The school should have had a strom shelter," I hear, yet that hallway was supposed to have had reinforced walls so that it could act as a shelter. Some idiot politician named Whitehouse (see also: Dan's post) is trying to blame Globull Warming, and thus conservatives. If he wants to place the blame for the death and destruction perpetrated by a tornado on the Great Plains (we should assume he's never seen The Wizard of Oz) on people, he may as well blame sprawl.

For those on the southern and eastern coasts who shake their heads, ask why everyone living on the Plains isn't required to have a basement and/or storm shelter, and want to take Tom Coburn to task right now, try to remember the word "hurricane". I know that I shook my head when I heard that we were going to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to rebuild a city situated between a large lake and a large river in a part of the country where massive, damaging hurricanes strike with semi-predictable regularity and I was particularly appalled that we would be rebuilding for a population who take a perverse pride in the kind of local and state level political corruption which greatly exacerbated the damage caused by Katrina.

But remember that everyone has to live somewhere and they have to do so within their means. Not everyone can afford a storm shelter that can withstand a 200 mile per hour tornado which sits on the ground and grinds away at everything in its path, nor is there a magical Keynesian money tree which will allow the federal government to buy one for everyone. As with New Orleans and the New Jersey coast, all we can do is rebuild as best we can with the resources we have with the hope that our best will preserve as many lives as possible in the future.

About the only silver lining to this terrible story is that, unlike me and my classmates, the people of Moore, OK, were warned that they were in the path of a tornado and every year, as meteorological science advances (thanks in no small part to people like this crazy bastard), warning time increases. Look at images of the path of the Moore, OK, tornado and ground damage and try to imagine how much larger the death toll would be if people had been caught outside with no warning.

OMFG: it's only been a matter of minutes since I posted this and now I see that the Internet's douche-in-residence is trying to pin the tornado on Republicans via the tired sequester argument.

MUST READ: Jeff's rant.

To Sheldon Whitehouse, he says:

If you wish to cast around for blame, you might wish to start with the very earth and its atmosphere that you pretend your political party alone wishes to protect:  because evidently, despite all your posing and hubris, she doesn’t much give a shit, and she goes along doing her  thing just as she’s always done.  And in the end, she’ll swallow you up in dirt and let the worms crawl through you, too.

To which I would like to add that Gaia has both broiled and frozen herself solid (several times) and she's come through just fine. It's likely that life made it through those periods, also.

And, finally, an on-target sack-tapping of David Sirota:

As with everything in your despicable, self-important, self-aggrandizing life, Mr Sirota, this casual conjoining of the deaths in Oklahoma to a political decision to cut something, anything — all so that you can wave the bloody shirts in the hopes of shaming people into agreeing to spend well beyond their means, all so you can pretend that you are more “compassionate” than the adults who understand that economics doesn’t succumb to the leftist desire to create reality from will and manufactured consent — is what defines people like you:  you are petty, opportunistic, shameless.  You are a social parasite who cynically makes his living off the essential goodness of the American people, preying as you do upon their readiness to feel guilt, to believe that if they had only done something (and you’ll be there to tell them what that is, be it pay more in taxes, build more bullet trains, fund more Solyndras, provide more taxpayer money for grants given to those looking to deligitimate the very system that makes their comfortable livings possible), no one in OK would have died, that the earth would have bent to your will and technocratic genius, that the tornadoes wouldn’t have stood a chance against your collectivist social engineering schemes.

You are a charlatan.  And a loudmouthed punk who stages his outrages for maximum exposure.

UPDATE

I'm going to stray from topic a little, but this is related to a point I was alluding to above.

This kind of stuff bugs the ever-loving shit out of me. Not that it is bad advice or that it is not relevant, but that every time there's a disaster it's tossed around in the same way that every other piece of self-serving preaching in our victim culture is. As I stated above, I went through a tornado as a small child and I wasn't even scared (I went so far as to go out of my way to confirm that with my mother last night). If my mom had gotten all touchy-feely with me about it, that would have freaked me out. I would have felt obligated to act–and maybe even actually feel–traumatized.

If your kid goes through something like that, don't immediately treat them as though they're delicate flowers just because you are freaked out. You're not doing him or her any favors. If it does so happen that they display unusual behavior (acting out, bed-wetting, etc) then feel free to get all maternal and touchy-feely.

MN Legislature Gives 53% Of Its Constituents The Middle Finger

leftist_marriage

Two months after the Red StarTribune released a poll saying that 53% of Minnesotans opposed gay marriage, the state legislature went ahead and legalized it anyway:

ST. PAUL, Minn. — The Minnesota Senate Monday voted to legalize same-sex marriage, sending the measure to Gov. Mark Dayton, who plans to sign it into law in a ceremony Tuesday evening.

[...]

The Senate vote was seen as a foregone conclusion, and the debate lacked much of the drama seen days before in the House. Crowds of people were back at the Capitol, singing, chanting and waving signs, although the supporters far outnumbered the opponents. Their cries for and against the bill filtered through the Senate chamber during the debate.

It was an extraordinary moment, one unimaginable last fall when Republicans controlled the state House and Senate following big wins in the 2010 election. With the GOP controlling the Legislature and a statutory ban on gay marriage already on Minnesota's books, Republicans pressed to write the gay marriage ban into the state's constitution.

That effort, though, galvanized liberal organizers, who launched a massive fundraising and get-out-the-vote campaign that defeated the proposed constitutional ban on gay marriage at the polls, and helped deliver DFL majorities back to both houses.

You'll note that they claim the pro-opposite sex marriage amendment was a bridge too far for Republicans in the general election, but they have only circumstantial evidence to back up that claim.

All that's left in this process is Governor Retard's Dayton's signature on the bill, which will come at noon. He has assured Minnesotans that the language in the bill make gay marriages "civil only" and that religious institutions which do not wish to bless those marriages will not be required to do so. Of course, if you believe that, you also believed the story told by those who opposed the pro-opposite sex marriage amendment last year:

Big Lake Republican Sen. Mary Kiffmeyer, though, suggested some voters were deceived last fall when they rejected a constitutional gay marriage ban. Voters "were told it was OK to vote no because nothing would change. Do they feel lied to? Yeah."

You may now start the countdown before stories like this start coming out of Minnesota.

What with the orgy of taxing and spending and jumping on the gun control bandwagon, with this recent vote on forced social engineering, the DFL is managing to make South Dakota look more attractive every day.

For Those Who Deny Administration Benghazi Shenanigans

nakoula

In ancient times…
Hundreds of years before the dawn of 'istry…
Someone did something to someone else in a place.
Benghazi
No one knows who they were, or…
where they are now
but one thing is certain…
What difference does it make now, anyway?

Meanwhile, some time during the Industrial Revolution–or yesterday (I forget which. Time is so relative and non-linear nowadays)–three more lone wolves were charged with crimes relating to the Boston Marathon bombing. And surprise, surprise, it turns out the FBI initially had no clue who they were talking to:

Kadyrbayev, Tazhayakov and the third student were interviewed by the FBI on Friday, April 19, four days after the bombing, after law enforcement learned the identity of the Tsarnaev brothers. The interview, the official said, lasted late into the evening and into Saturday morning. But there wasn’t enough evidence to charge them with a crime.

It wasn’t until the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement division heard about the interviews later on Saturday that they realized Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov were not currently of legal immigration status, and ICE officials went to pick them up and detain them.

Just as they did with Suspect 1, the feds had all of the information they needed to stop at least one, if not two, of these guys from committing their (alleged) crimes, yet all they did was chat with them and then send them on their way.

Compare this to the case of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula. While Nakoula does not appear to be a saint,  neither was he the subject of security warnings from at least one–probably two–foreign governments, nor had his views been enough of a concern for the FBI to interview him about them prior to Benghazi. And while the feds seemed to stand around scratching their heads regarding both Suspects 1 & 2 and the Kazakhs, when it came to Benghazi they seemed to know just where to find Nakoula's sorry ass.

So when it comes to finding the perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombing, the feds are increasingly looking like the Keystone Cops, yet when it came to pinning Benghazi on Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, they displayed the keen and facile investigative minds capable of interpreting data and making the correct intuitive leaps you see only in an episode of CSI (the one with William Peterson and not –LOL– Ted Danson).

Now tell me that everything coming (particularly the deafening silence) from the administration on Benghazi doesn't have a fish-like smell to it.

One Down, One To Go

tsarnaev_bros

All of Boston is now, effectively, on lockdown. They have a madman on the loose and they know who he is:

A national security official identified the hunted man as Dzhokar A. Tsarnaev, 19, and said the dead suspect was his brother, Tamerlan Tsarneav, 26. The brothers had been in the United States for several years, the official said.

Beyond their original act of terror, the brothers robbed a 7-11, killed one cop, stole a police car, carjacked an SUV, threw IEDs out on the street, and had a shootout with the cops. Boston authorities are wisely telling everone in the Boston area to stay indoors. I'd add, "reload" and "don't get the bright idea of going over and knocking on your neighbor's door".

There's lots of "don't speculate" precautionary advice going around and I mostly agree with it. I just want to add a couple of caveats. Firstly, in hindsight we can fairly say that J-Nap stating, "that no evidence that the bombings at the Boston Marathon are part of a wider plot," was a completely fucking outrageous statement. And secondly, that Vladimir Putin, just before his daily bear rasslin' workout, pointed at his TV and yelled, "See? See?!! Now do you believe me?"