The Necropolitan Sentinel

chi per lungo silenzio parea fioco

Home » Archive by category "Featured Propaganda" (Page 2)

BattleStar Trek Firescape Galactica Wars Off The Shoulder Of Orion

If you consider that the mainstream press never bothered to independently vet Barack H. Obama (sorry, guys, reading his autobiography doesn't count*), you should have been as surprised as I was when they went out of their way to dub him the "First Nerd President" (John Quincy Adams anyone?)

The evidence they provided was thin gruel indeed. Apparently he read Spider-Man and Conan the Barbarian comic books as a child so, naturally the press somehow translated "read" into "collected". Yet, at least one independent account suggests the latter is patently false:

Grandpa bought me [Indonesian classmate Rully Dasaad] all the DC Comic books, and I was the only one who had them, so Barry and Yanto would borrow the books and copy pictures of Batman and Spider-Man out and ask me to judge which was better.

More damning is his inability to tell John Hodgman, at a Correspondents' Dinner, the name of Conan's god. Not a minor detail which a collector would fail to recall at a moment's notice. I bet he doesn't even know "what is best in life".

Then again, considering the way his administration treats reporters and the GOP, maybe he does know that last one.

So, sorry, reading your friend's copies of Spider-Man and Conan the Barbarian when you're seven and then failing to recall major elements of your favorite comic books gives you a failing grade on the nerd test.

Of course there was one president in recent history, Ronald Reagan, who was known to read Spider-Man as an adult, but instead of adding texture to an exotic biography, his reading of comics was often used as evidence that he was a simple-minded dullard. Reagan, well known to be a fan of science fiction, who was the president who took his cue for space policy from a group of prominent science fiction writers, who made the Space Shuttle program a central fixture of his administration, and who was responsible for pushing a space-based missle defense system which will forever be associated with the most successful and widely-known science fiction film franchise ever. Yet Reagan was never applauded by the press for being a "nerd". Barack Obama, OTOH, kills the Mars exploration program and he's the "First Nerd President".

One of the more laughable pieces of evidence proving Obama's nerditude is the infamous image of him posing in front of the Superman statue in Metropolis, IL. I'm sure that no other politician — particularly no other Illinois politician — has ever been to Metropolis, IL, and thought to pose in front of the Superman statue. Only the First Nerd President, with his unique insight into Nerd Culture, would ever think to do that.

The big evidence, though, is supposed to be his "embrace of social media". One of the hallmarks of the nerd as we know him or her is early-adoption of technology. By the time Obama was making a BFD about social media, the "technology"** as we know it today was at least five years old. Five years on != early-adoption.

He does indeed have the money and resources to create a vast social media network and bend it to his will, but Barack Obama, personally, seems to track technology at about the same rate as a backwards baseball cap-wearing d-bag who keeps up with the latest versions of Madden and CoD or a college girl with her Hello Kitty smart phone.

What's most damning, though, is his popularity and supposed coolness. Steve Jobs was considered very cool, yet despite working in the world of technology, he was never a nerd. He was an artist/businessman and the products he sold were designed specifically to be anti-nerd. Bill Gates, OTOH, was very definitely a nerd. He was a programmer/businessman who is envied, and sometimes admired, by the general public for his wealth and success but they have never considered him cool.

The only people who ever think a nerd is cool are other nerds.

The minor news to come out of Obama's Star Wars/Star Trek gaffe is that there is no question now — he is not a nerd. The major news is the media lie, past and present, about his biography. Many of them, including LucasFilms itself, are pointing out that in some of the deeper recesses of the Star Wars universe, you can find such a thing as the Jedi Mind Meld. SO we're supposed to believe that Obama's knowledge of the Star Wars universe is so extensive that, Comic Book Guy-like, he intentionally used an obscure reference among lay people. Yet they seem to completely ignore the fact that the WH hurriedly whacked together a graphic and URL reiterating the fact that the phrase he used was supposed to be a Star Wars/Trek mashup. So it was mistake, but it wasn't a mistake and, most importantly, it wasn't a dorky verbal gaffe which would make him look like some sort of nerdy Melvin.


*I remember when I was 34 and wrote my autobiography — a rollicking tale recounting the rich tapestry which was my life up to that point… Oh, right, that never happened because even I knew that writing an autobiography at such a young age, unless you went through an experience in which you were forced to cut your own arm off with a pen knife to survive, is an astonishing act of hubris.

** Social media does not involve any new, or special, form of technology.

WH Pulls a Peewee Herman

I know what you're thinking, but no, they weren't caught masturbating in an adult movie theater (though it wouldn't surprise me if they were, and then @daveweigel could tell how us it's a non-story). Instead, they're trying to pull an, "I meant to do that," for The Preciousssss's Star Trek/Star Wars screw-up.

Obama conflated tropes from Star Trek and Star Wars during his press briefing. “And I know that this has been some of the conventional wisdom that’s been floating around Washington that somehow, even though most people agree that I’m being reasonable, that most people agree I’m presenting a fair deal, the fact that they don’t take it means that I should somehow do a Jedi mind-meld with these folks and convince them to do what’s right”

[...]

After the briefing, the White House Twitter feed published a photo of Obama. “These aren’t the cuts you are looking for,” the caption reads in another Star Wars-Star Trek merger. “To deny the facts would be illogical.”

The URL “whitehouse.gov/jedimindmeld” also redirects viewers to the White House page about sequestration.

As indeed it does.

Really guys? You super-genius spin doctors/tech gurus/hip culture mavens really think we're so stupid that we're going to believe that you had this planned in advance with it's own URL and everything? Or is it that you really think The Lightbringer couldn't possibly make a dorky and bumbling George W. Bush-esque mistake so you have to everything you can to try to cover his tracks?

I'll be waiting for the SNL skit on this one.

Or I would if I actually watched SNL anymore.

Chilling Effect

I don't know if any of you damn kids remember, but there was a time when both the White House and the media, no matter how partisan, worried about the mere appearance of anyone trying to chill public speech, particularly that of the press. Even the administration of the guy who brazenly violated a chubby intern with a cigar in the Oval Office worried about it:

After days of measured statements of grief and outrage over the Oklahoma City bombing, Mr. Clinton edged today into a new discussion of the civic and political climate that might have encouraged it. As soon as he finished speaking, senior White House aides became concerned that his remarks would be interpreted as an attack on radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh and rushed to insist that the President had only been urging Americans to protect free speech by speaking out against hatred.

From some time in the '80s until some time after, oh…I dunno…January of 2009, you couldn't sit through a news program, national or local, without hearing the phrase "chilling effect" uttered ominously by one talking hair-do or another. Viewers were always left with the unambiguous impression that "chilling" speech was a BFD. Remember when the press went apeshit over the Bush 43 administration telling a "scientist" employed by the federal government that he shouldn't go around spewing out policy demands based on his own specious research? That episode looks like a quaint anachronism now.

If the White House War on Fox News wasn't enough of a warning, the treatment Sharyl Attkison received when she tried to ask some questions about Fast & Furious should have been:

Well the DOJ woman was just yelling at me. The guy from the White House on Friday night literally screamed at me and cussed at me. [Laura: Who was the person? Who was the person at Justice screaming?] Eric Schultz. Oh, the person screaming was [DOJ spokeswoman] Tracy Schmaler, she was yelling not screaming. And the person who screamed at me was Eric Schultz at the White House.

But, oh no, we've got Bob Woodward, the heroic Dean of Leftist journalists — the Watergate Warrior and Truth-to-Poweringest reporter of them all — threatened by the White House and even now they're not only ignoring the "chilling effect" aspect of the story, they're spinning their little wheels as fast as they can to defend the White House. Here's a sample of headlines:

  • The Meaning Of 'Regret': Journalist Bob Woodward, White House Disagree — NPR
  • Oh, Please, The White House Didn't 'Threaten' Bob Woodward — Business Insider
  • From Legend to Laughing Stock: Bob Woodward Cites Bogus 'Threat,' Calls Obama 'Nixonian' — The Nation
  • Bob Woodward, Obama Aide Spar, Causing Confusion Over Definition Of 'Regret' — HuffPo
  • Not news: White House threatens journalist — The Week

The JuiceBoxers have been all a-Twitter, trying to make that "regret" a reality for Woodward and assuring us that it's all no BFD. David Weigel, as you might expect, is being particular obnoxious, managing to call Woodward an old crank and preen about his own "access" at the same time. He along with others are reassuring us that they get yelled at and threatened "all the time" by WH "flacks". See? They talk to WH flacks all the time, aren't you impressed? The worst of it may be that Weigel is trying to be funny in the process, which I think Kübler-Ross would classify as a part of "denial".

And then there's smug little shit Matt Yglesias:

No, lil Mattie, it goes: "First they came for FoxNews and I sat back sipping my juice box and giggling like a twelve-year-old because I was not a member of the unclean political tribe…" If they're willing to try to take down a major news organization like FNC, if they yell at and threaten Woodward, and they scream at and threaten you JournoListers "all the time", what do you think they'd be willing to do to you if some day you decide to grow some balls and stray off the plantation? I don't think you'd be giggling anymore.

I have no great love for Woodward — he's not "suddenly a hero" to me — but "chilling" speech is, in fact, always a danger and if fighting against that is no longer the current crop of journalist's most basic concern, then they need to hang it up and leave that job to someone else.

See also: Making Woodward Regret

And BTW, some day someone really needs to tell Chuck Todd to wash that shit off his face.

 

Making Woodward Regret

It's been 1400 days since there was a budget, and the last time Obama proposed one, which he is legally required to do by the Constitution's imperious 'shall,' not even a single Democrat Representative found he was able to vote for it, the document submitted was so ludicrous. On the eve of a 'Grand Bargain' with the Speaker of the House, Obama moved the goalposts and scuttled the deal. The result is that he and his team proposed sequestration, and the Republicans accepted. They caved on higher taxes for the 1%, and Obama was to respond by cutting some of that waste and fraud out of the federal budget, which years ago when he was first a candidate for President he promised to go through line by line.

The sequester was to be a boogeyman so frightening that certainly the budget cutters and revenue seekers would sit down at the table and cut a deal, but in true Obama fashion it became simply an opportunity to kick the can down the road. Obama's handlers were so certain that this 'draconian' session of across the board cuts would never come to pass, that even as it was looming nobody breathed a word against the newly re-elected President's plan to send a message by going on a golfing vacation in Florida. But when the President returned from his hard-earned me time, there was the sequester looming large, though nowhere near as large as $16 trillion in US debt headed towards $17 trillion. So the President did what the President does: he went on a nationwide tour to declare that the 2% of expected increased outlays projected to cover the insane federal expenditures given the American people by the administration and its friends in Congress would be horribly axed if the sequester, proposed by the administration itself, were actually to take place, and that this would be an enormous disaster for the American people in their groveling dependency—which the proggies had done everything they could to cultivate. Furthermore, the President and his spokescreatures insisted that the President had had the very idea of the sequester forced upon him by the evil advocates of the 1%.

Now, this was abject bullshit, but most of the supine MSM didn't really care to recall the course of events very much, and if forced to decided that it was unreasonable behavior on both sides that had brought us to this dreadful pass. Bob Woodward, though, had the audacity to remember quite clearly the series of decisions and decisions deferred that had brought us there, and that is why Obama economic adviser Gene Sperling felt it necessary to call and harangue him for a half hour, and then send him an email stating that Sperling felt that Woodward would regret reporting the matter according to his recollection. Woodward, Sperling held, was missing the forest for the trees. The trees in this case represented the times that the President had actually pushed the sequester, whereas (panning out and up, up, up) the forest represented the evident big-picture fact that the President had had the sequester forced on him by Republican recalcitrance. Woodward, once a liberal hero for helping to bring down the Nixon White House over the Watergate cover-up, did not identify the White House aide, but did explain to Wolf Blitzer that he felt the phone call and the admonition that he would regret the way that he had represented the sequester publicly constituted a threat.

Immediately, the remnants of JournoList leaped into action, heaping scorn on the sudden has-been. A mere two days after Robert Bork posthumously revealed that President Nixon had tried to bribe him to dismiss Archibald Cox, Matt Yglesias opined on Twitter that Woodward's heresy had made him think that perhaps Nixon got a raw deal from Woodward. David Plouffe reared his head to state that Woodward ought to be put out to pasture. The White House decided that due to their intense push-back against Woodward, it should be BuzzFeed that got the scoop regarding the identity of the Senior White House Aide that had leaned on Woodward to amend his recollections. Mere days after Jay Carney fled the podium under questioning regarding $500k donations to Obama's unaffiliated Organizing for Action purchasing access to the most transparent and ethical President evah, and after Ben Carson revealed that the White House had on several occasions attempted to get him to submit a copy of his Prayer Breakfast speech for their approval, and after several outlets had decided to excise the First Lady's false statement that a Chicago girl had been killed with an automatic weapon, the President's media functionaries were demonizing and denegrating a journalist who had clearly outlived his usefulness. And as all of this was going on, Sharyl Attkisson was Tweeting out a series of White House failures to reveal information regarding the Benghazi massacre.

Woodward had felt that Sperling had tried to censor him in effect, so the only logical thing for Obama's media hacks to do was to try to bully him into submission. If Woodward regarded Sperling's call and email as a promise to inflict punishment, then certainly he must be punished for so saying. Obama's role in the sequester, the administration's role in Benghazi, the relation of OFA to White House access and all the rest were matters of interpretation, but Woodward's expression of his points of view was objectively false and evil, and he would have to pay.

One-Note Touré

I swear. This friggin' guy.

You got it: RACÉ-DIDDLY-ACISM!

Diddly.

Except that Nixon was a candidaté when hé appeared on Laugh-In. And Bill Clinton was a candidaté when hé appeared on The Arsenio Hall Show. Barack Obama was the first sitting president to appear, as a celebrity, on a late night talk show. Of all of thé Presidents and First Ladies in the television agé, only the Obamas seem to enjoy the smell of their own farts so much that they will shamelessly sell out the power of the Executivé and assumé that it's just finé.

So no, Mr. Niblet, it's not RAAAAACISM!, it's about thé First Lady going on national television, giving conservatives thé metaphorical middlé finger, and shamelessly waving in our faces the fact that Hollywood and thé Democratic Party are rogering each other.

BTW, neither Ronald Reagan nor Laura Bush weré presenters at the Oscars whilé in officé and yes, Benghazi is a BFD, no matter how much you act as if it's a non-issué.

The Ongoing Problem With Karl Rove

 

The Turd Blossom In His Most Natural Position

Why do I bring him up now?

Because Hugh Hewitt said this the other day on Twitter:

Still waiting for critics of Rove to nominate best GOP strategist…for most it is like hating your starting QB but having no back-up.

Hewitt's statement got my dander up a bit and then I sorta went on a rant.

Oops.

Allow me me sorta clean up my tweets for human consumption.

First, I have no other GOP strategerist to replace Karl Rove, so I'll concede Hewitt a well-earned point.  If I absolutely had to pick someone to run the 2016 Republican ticket, I'd hire the person who ran either Scott Walker's or Bobby Jindal's campaigns and then hope for the best.  At least those folks have had success in the last four years.  

Like every other facet of the GOP panoply, it's very tough to have confidence in politicos based in Washington DC.  Choosing somebody outside the Beltway might be the only viable option.

But here's something I've been wondering.  How come nobody–not the slick consultants, the overpriced underperforming tech gurus, or the high-powered campaign honchos–could figure out just how stupid and self-defeating Mitt Romney's pro-life positioning was?

Think about the journey Romney took to become an anti-abortion presidential candidate.  Homeboy was pro-abortion for most of his public life.  He only started making vaguely pro-life noises in 2005.  He then tried to assure the GOP faithful that he was pro-life.

There were several problems with Mitt's messaging.  Most pro-lifers were very skeptical of Romney's rather recent and not completely convincing conversion.  That alone probably depressed social conservative turnout and hurt Romney's chances on Election Day.

However, Mitt being perceived as an insincere opportunist wasn't his biggest problem.  Romney never used his pro-life position for anything except winning the GOP nomination.  Once he got that, being anti-abortion was more or less forgotten by the campaign and the candidate.

Funny thing is, Obamaton propaganda ministers David Plouffe and Jim Messina didn't forget. While Romney was trying and failing to make the election about the national debt going supernova and the sputtering American economy, Obama succeeded in making 2012 about Mitt being a misogynistic piece of dogshit.  Naturally, Team Barry used Romney's pro-life stance as the convenient hook to slam the former Massachusetts governor as a vagina-hating douchecanoe.  Romney never defended being anti-abortion except in the weakest most mewling ways.  Even worse, the GOP standard bearer never employed his pro-life stance as a club to beat up Obama at all.

For God's sake, Obama voted against the Born Alive Act when he was an Illinois muckety-muck.  He gave (and continues to give) lots of federal tax dollar love to Planned Parenthood, the same organization that was cool with giving abortions to what it thought were underage sex slaves.  There was plenty of anti-life extremism in Obama's curriculum vitae that could've been exploited by the Romney camp.  But they just couldn't bring themselves to do it.

So why did Mitt Romney even bother going through the motions to become a pro-lifer in the first place?  His position on the abortion issue didn't energize evangelical Christians and other components of the social conservative movement.  It didn't expand the party's base by getting significant chunks of the Latino vote, a constituency I keep hearing is full of natural Republican voters.  Further, Mitt never employed his pro-life stance as a pivot to attack Barack Obama's shockingly radical anti-life actions.  Once the primaries were over, being pro-life didn't help Romney in any way.  It can be credibly argued that being a squishy half-assed pro-lifer hurt Romney because it gave Obama an opening to create the War On Women narrative against the GOP standard-bearer.

This should be an iron-clad rule in politics:  If your ideological positions are not helping you, they will be used by your opponent to hurt you.  This is especially true when it comes to abortion, which is far more emotional and polarizing then an issue like energy independence or entitlement reform.  Mitt and his team forgot this law of partisan warfare and it cost them dearly.

I'll admit that this post is a lot of gussied-up Monday morning quarterbacking.  On the other hand, the Republican Party consultant class gets paid to figure this out before the election and they still don't know how to play the game.  If you listen to Karl Rove and his ilk, they still think the GOP's problems are caused by being too right-wing.  They've had just as much time as I've had to do a post-game analysis of the November debacle.  Their strongest recommendations involve letting Obama get his way on everything, then lather-rinse-repeat until 2016.

To be fair, Karl Rove won two presidential elections in the last decade, so its not like he's got no game.  The problem is that he doesn't understand why Mitt Romney got his ass beat two and a half months ago.  Nor does anybody else who runs anything in the Republican Party seem to get it either.  If Turd Blossom is the best the GOP can do, then they deserve to perish because they suck at politics.

RELATED:  I don't wanna belabor the point, but I'm going to anyway. 

Politics–like life itself–is often not about what you say, but how you say it.  If Barack Obama stated, "I'm going to raise your taxes because I think you're too stupid to know what to do with all your money", he'd win 10 states, tops.  If the President declared, "I'm going to obliterate the Second Amendment and incrementally take away your guns because I don't trust you, the great unwashed bitter clingers", his approval rating would hover just above herpes.  If Two-Pack Attack Barry admitted that ObamaCare was going to feature death panels to determine who gets what kinds of medical treatment, Romney would've won the 2012 election with seventy percent of the popular vote.

But of course, Obama doesn't do that.  The Duffer-in-Chief believes all those things in his heart, but he never says them out loud.  Instead, he always couches his ideology in nicey-nice pablum:  "balanced approach", "common sense gun laws", "Obama does care".  Even better?  As he describes his own campus Marxism as true-blue Americana,  he's turns the Republicans into the Ku Klux Klan, the Taliban and the Nazis all rolled into one big slimy ball of extremism.

It doesn't help matters when prominent candidates on the Republican side completely lose the plot and play into his hands.  The problem with the GOP isn't that Todd Akin misspoke on the life issue.  It's that Todd Akin was never taught how to speak credibly and effectively about his political views in the first place.

To stick with the abortion issue, being pro-life isn't enough for a political candidate.  Being extremely pro-life isn't enough.  Being pro-life and then turning your position into a cudgel to beat up your opponent is what has to happen if you want to win.  Allowing yourself to get bogged down in some weird rhetorical side street will only get you in trouble.  If you're not on offense, you're on defense.  That means you're getting your ass kicked.

This is true of every political issue.  Why take a stand on any topic if it cannot be weaponized and deployed against an opponent?